Confident Goal Setting: How to Pick Up a Cow, Daily

Posted on 10 Mar, 2008

23 Comments so far »

  1. Tannage said,

    Wrote on March 10, 2008 @ 5:50 pm

    This reminds me of a quote from Cheng Man Ching, a contemporary Tai Chi master.

    “Mastery in Tai Chi is like building a tower out of paper. Every day you put another sheet on the pile”

    Lifting a calf every day probably works best with pursuits that grow as you grow, or the development of habits (hopefully good ones). You can get good at almost anything so long as you dutifully apply yourself every day.

    I remember using this metaphor for learning how to cook. When you start from a zero knowledge base, cooking that dish every day is like lifting a very heavy calf. I sometimes wonder why it took so long for things to stop tasting like formeldahyde but sticking at it was the thing that worked in the end!

  2. Nez said,

    Wrote on March 10, 2008 @ 8:43 pm

    Anything worth doing takes some doing.

    A baby has to crawl before he can walk, etc.

    Clay, great job on explaining the small steps we all need to make to work towards our goals. Tying together the ancient with the modern is a great way to show just how timeless worthy principles are.

    The best part is “goal velocity” — I never thought about breaking down something into a more manageable — even tangible — rate.

    Goal velocity for spouse-finding might be: finding a good job, social networking (in real life), dating, etc.

  3. Clay Collins said,

    Wrote on March 10, 2008 @ 10:54 pm

    @Tannage: Thanks for the Cheng Man Ching quotation, it will likely show up in the future post. I think you’re right about the calf analogy working best with tasks that grow as you grow–there are goals that perhaps should be achieved during critical periods and in a more qualitative and non-linear fashion. I like your latest post, by the way, on learning how to cook. Thanks for posting that.

    @Nez: I don’t know if your goal velocity list for spouse-finding was meant to be partially humorous, but this part made me laugh: “social networking (in real life).” Items on the list for my former self (10 years ago) might include getting out of the house, talking to girls, and not cutting my own hair. Good times. Anyway, I’m glad you like the goal velocity concept; I don’t know where that came from but my fingers typed it so here it is. I think that coming with with a “goal unit” per “time unit” rate makes us solidify our goals in a way that we might not otherwise.

  4. @Stephen | Productivity in Context said,

    Wrote on March 11, 2008 @ 11:21 am

    This is great advice for goal-setting. It is so very important to do a little bit each day to get yourself closer to accomplishing your long-term goals. As part of my own Quarterly Review, I look at assigning myself one thing that I can do to each month that gets me closer to those 3-5 year goals.

  5. Paul Montwill | Sharingmatters.com said,

    Wrote on March 11, 2008 @ 1:48 pm

    Good you mentioned about time. Nowadays everything need to be today, tomorrow, there is no time to “waste”. Facebook was launched yesterday, today is popular, tomorrow is gone. But we still should stick to the plan and give ourselves fair amount of time to reach our goals otherwise we all get mad! Nice Helen Keler quotation.

  6. Hunter Nuttall said,

    Wrote on March 11, 2008 @ 5:45 pm

    Goal velocity can be tricky for some things. If you try to write a 300 page novel in two years by writing .5 pages per day, you’ll be fine for a while. But at some point you’ll find that you don’t know what’s going to happen next in the storyline, or you need to go back and rewrite huge sections, or something else happens that leaves you writing 0 pages per day for a while.

    I’ve never written a novel so I’m just assuming here, but it’s definitely true when writing a computer program. Some of the comments have touched on this idea of non-linear progress.

    But the main thing is that most people start writing 0 pages per day from day one! They’ll never pick up a cow that way.

  7. Jonathan Mead said,

    Wrote on March 11, 2008 @ 7:02 pm

    What if all I have a pig and a chicken? I guess I’m out of luck.

  8. Clay Collins said,

    Wrote on March 12, 2008 @ 5:25 am

    @Hunter: Very true. Many goals can’t be achieved in a linear fashion, so stay tuned for my upcoming “How to Pick up a Quantum Baseball Every Other Week” post :-). OK, on a more serious note: I think that goal velocity can be thought of similarly to miles per hour in a car. That is, even with cruse control, you can maintain a specific speed for the entire duration of a drip to your final destination. There are stop signs and you’ll usually need to stop and eat or even get your car fixed. The important thing is the *average* speed for the trip. Thanks for the insight.

    @Jonathan: Ahem… Well, Jonathan, if you want pig or chicken-sized goals, then be my guest :-)

    @Paul: I like this: “Facebook was launched yesterday, today is popular, tomorrow is gone.” yeah, many of us want instant goal gratification and quit when we don’t get it. Perhaps that’s because we often don’t choose goals that intrinsically motivate us but instead allow external influences to shape our supposedly “internal” goals. I know that I’ve done this more than once.

    @Stephen: Nice. I think that working on your long-terms goals on a steady and consistent basis (no matter how small the progress is) maintains goal inertia, which is important.

  9. JEMi @ InMyHeels said,

    Wrote on March 12, 2008 @ 2:46 pm

    :) Nice - I knew you were going to get deep with that cow.

    Since I love big beautiful goals, it’s nice to see someone not say “Ok, crazy. Can’t do it”
    I am right in line with this thought process - I agree that time+goal velocity=success. It’s nice to see it simply put.. a reminder I sure can use right now.

    And for that, I thank you.

  10. Desika Nadadur | I Am My Own Master said,

    Wrote on March 12, 2008 @ 3:24 pm

    Hey Clay,

    Very nice article! For some reason, the trackback from my blog to this article did not show. May be still in moderation? :-)

    -Desika

  11. Paul Montwill | Sharingmatters.com said,

    Wrote on March 12, 2008 @ 10:10 pm

    You are very clever! Indeed, people find external goals and make them internal. It took me very long to understand that. The best receipt for success is to find the goals that match your spirit (some may find The Purpose Driven Life useful here) and just do the things you are the best at. If you always loved playing tennis why do you want to be the best in fishing? Because your friend is?

    It is funny how we can spend our whole life pleasing others jumping from one place to another. Steve Jobs put it simple - find the thing you love to do and do it! I don’t want to be very rich, I just want to do the things I love and earn for my family from it.

    Have you read “Neuromancer” by Gibson? “Time is time”. Nothing more.

  12. Clay Collins said,

    Wrote on March 13, 2008 @ 3:59 pm

    @Deskia: Hmm…. for some reason I didn’t see it. Thank you so much for linking to this article, by the way! I’ll check and make sure that I accept track backs (I’m pretty sure that I do).

  13. Desika Nadadur | I Am My Own Master said,

    Wrote on March 13, 2008 @ 9:06 pm

    Clay,

    You are very welcome! :-)

    -Desika

  14. Pat R said,

    Wrote on March 14, 2008 @ 4:35 am

    Clay - enjoyed this post. It was interesting and fun to read a different take on goal setting.

  15. Clay Collins said,

    Wrote on March 14, 2008 @ 5:54 am

    @Pat: I’m really glad :-). Thanks for stopping by again.

  16. Mona Pellerin said,

    Wrote on March 15, 2008 @ 4:29 pm

    I have enjoyed this website and would like to try the movie later. Good idea!

    A couple of comments on goal velocity: An important element that drives goals is the passion you have for completing the goal. For example, writers have days when the the “juices flow” or the runner goes 6 minutes past his former time not 3 min. It could be a trap that says, “Well, since I did so good last time, I think I will miss a time towards my pursit. Actually, missing an allotted time can be a setback.

    The idea that completing a goal is a continuous process aligns with your goal velocity but, the flexibility might also include: “If I do better at one time, I still maintain my original velocity speed the next time and not feel as if I have to compete with my best time” - this could lead to burn-out.

  17. Clay Collins said,

    Wrote on March 16, 2008 @ 6:15 am

    @Mona: I see what you’re saying. Perhaps there should instead be a minimum daily goal velocity might be one adaptation. For example, if I want to write 6 pages per day, then if I write 12 pages one day I’ll still need to write 6 pages the next day. Very good point!

    –Clay

  18. Mona Pellerin said,

    Wrote on March 16, 2008 @ 1:49 pm

    I think your adaptation is a good way of putting it! It prevents some passionless automation to occur. I did subscribe and look forward to your articles. I am a writer also - mostly about social issues - especially as they relate to social norms.

  19. Mark McGuinness said,

    Wrote on March 19, 2008 @ 4:57 pm

    Thanks Clay, another thoughtful post and a very memorable analogy!

  20. Ben Wills said,

    Wrote on March 28, 2008 @ 11:43 am

    Nice article. Do you have a URL that has more details about the FSU experiment? I’ve been digging around for it and can’t find it. Would love to see more details on it.

  21. crotone said,

    Wrote on May 19, 2008 @ 6:40 am

    [...] [...]

  22. CARISPRODOL information. » CARISPRODOL.NET said,

    Wrote on May 19, 2008 @ 7:05 am

    [...] 6th 20century B.C.It was said that, as a boy, Milo trained for the Olympics by daily lifting…read more | digg [...]

  23. simon bedak said,

    Wrote on October 18, 2008 @ 5:34 pm

    Being a cattleman from Australia, I accidentally stumbled across this article whilst looking for a way to lift a cow for real as the animal was having trouble calving. Regrettably, the cow I had to lift this morning will have to be destroyed due to, well, nature taking its course.

    I must say though, Milo’s story whilst at face value is entertaining appears to be utterly impractical.

    Lifting a cow simply for the sake of lifting a cow is pointless, if not merely egotistic. Lifting a cow to try and save both its and its calf’s life appears to be a better reason.

Comment RSS · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment

Name: (Required)

E-mail: (Required)

Website:

Comment: